4 Comments
User's avatar
Giorgi Sanikidze's avatar

Good analysis. Iran’s shift to attrition and regional pressure shows the war is becoming systemic, not just military. When Hormuz, energy flows, and markets become part of the strategy, the likely outcome is not victory but a prolonged, controlled stalemate shaped by bargaining power.

Mitka's avatar

“In much the same way Egypt was the last country Britain faced as a superpower, so too do I think Iran will be the last one we face as number one.”

I was able to get an essay from a drone operator at Holloman about the present state of things (of course, more a meditation than actual policy details.)

https://nathankyoung.substack.com/p/finding-remote-work-as-a-drone-operator?r=2kp7ol

Synthetic Civilization's avatar

The real strategic transition is from retaliation to cost-curve manipulation.

Under asymmetry, Iran cannot outmatch superior force directly, so it is trying to alter the adversary’s calculus by regionalizing the battlefield and targeting the infrastructure that underwrites escalation.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 10
Comment deleted